Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Poverty & Homelessness

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Family & Child Welfare

Family & Child Welfare

Family & Child Welfare

Children in Transition (CIT) Count

Value
Compared to:

Family & Child Welfare

Children in Transition (CIT) Count

Value
Compared to:

Children in Transition (CIT) Count County: Washoe

Current Value:

Children in Transition (CIT) Count County: Washoe

2,026
Count of WCSD students without permanent housing during the school year
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2,026) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,950).
Prior Value
(1,950)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Family & Child Welfare

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Family & Child Welfare

Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

Current Value:

Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

12.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (16.9%), Washoe has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washoe has a value of 12.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Family & Child Welfare

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Family & Child Welfare

Families Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

Current Value:

Families Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.6%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (9.0%), Washoe has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Washoe has a value of 6.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Family & Child Welfare

Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Family & Child Welfare

Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Young Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

Current Value:

Young Children Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

13.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 13.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 13.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.2%), Washoe has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Washoe has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Family & Child Welfare

Youth not in School or Working

Value
Compared to:

Family & Child Welfare

Youth not in School or Working

Value
Compared to:

Youth not in School or Working County: Washoe

Current Value:

Youth not in School or Working County: Washoe

1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.8%), Washoe has a value of 1.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Washoe has a value of 1.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Food Insecurity

Food Insecurity

Food Insecurity

Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity

Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance County: Washoe

Current Value:

Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance County: Washoe

40%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 40% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 40% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (36%), Washoe has a value of 40% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(36%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Washoe has a value of 40% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (40%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (32%).
Prior Value
(32%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Food Insecurity

Child Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity

Child Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Child Food Insecurity Rate County: Washoe

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (20.9%), Washoe has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(20.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.5%), Washoe has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (16.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Food Insecurity

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity

Food Insecurity Rate

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Food Insecurity Rate County: Washoe

12.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 12.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.4%), Washoe has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Washoe has a value of 12.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (12.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.7%).
Prior Value
(9.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Food Insecurity

Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity

Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Value
Compared to:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children County: Washoe

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children County: Washoe

44.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (48.4%), Washoe has a value of 44.5%.
NV Value
(48.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Washoe has a value of 44.5%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Food Insecurity

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Food Insecurity

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Washoe

Current Value:

Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count) County: Washoe

9,001
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homelessness

Homelessness

Homelessness

Homelessness: PIT Count of Persons in Weekly Motels

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness

Homelessness: PIT Count of Persons in Weekly Motels

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness: PIT Count of Persons in Weekly Motels County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homelessness: PIT Count of Persons in Weekly Motels County: Washoe

1,071
Count of persons experiencing homelessness living in weekly motels
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (1,071) is less and better than the previously measured value (2,132).
Prior Value
(2,132)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homelessness

Homelessness: Chronically Homeless

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness

Homelessness: Chronically Homeless

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness: Chronically Homeless County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homelessness: Chronically Homeless County: Washoe

60
Count of persons chronically homeless
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (60) is less and better than the previously measured value (68).
Prior Value
(68)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homelessness

Homelessness: Point-in-Time (PIT) Count

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness

Homelessness: Point-in-Time (PIT) Count

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness: Point-in-Time (PIT) Count County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homelessness: Point-in-Time (PIT) Count County: Washoe

1,760
Count of persons experiencing homelessness
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (1,760) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,690).
Prior Value
(1,690)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homelessness

Homelessness: Transitional Aged Youth 18-24

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness

Homelessness: Transitional Aged Youth 18-24

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness: Transitional Aged Youth 18-24 County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homelessness: Transitional Aged Youth 18-24 County: Washoe

6
Count of youth aged 18-24 experiencing homelessness
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (6) is less and better than the previously measured value (8).
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homelessness

Homelessness: Veterans

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness

Homelessness: Veterans

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness: Veterans County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homelessness: Veterans County: Washoe

17
Count of unsheltered veterans
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15).
Prior Value
(15)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homelessness

Rate of Homeless Persons Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Homelessness

Rate of Homeless Persons Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Rate of Homeless Persons Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Rate of Homeless Persons Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

332.2
Rate per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (267.3), Washoe has a value of 332.2 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(267.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (195.0), Washoe has a value of 332.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(195.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (332.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (330.9).
Prior Value
(330.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing Conditions

Housing Conditions

Housing Conditions

Ratio of Assisted Households to Households in Need

Value
Compared to:

Housing Conditions

Ratio of Assisted Households to Households in Need

Value
Compared to:

Ratio of Assisted Households to Households in Need County: Washoe

Current Value:

Ratio of Assisted Households to Households in Need County: Washoe

27%
Percentage of housing assistance to the need for affordable units
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (27%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (30%).
Prior Value
(30%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing Conditions

Overcrowded Households

Value
Compared to:

Housing Conditions

Overcrowded Households

Value
Compared to:

Overcrowded Households County: Washoe

Current Value:

Overcrowded Households County: Washoe

4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (4.3%), Washoe has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Washoe has a value of 4.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing Conditions

Severe Housing Problems

Value
Compared to:

Housing Conditions

Severe Housing Problems

Value
Compared to:

Severe Housing Problems County: Washoe

Current Value:

Severe Housing Problems County: Washoe

17.3%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.8%), Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.2%).
Prior Value
(17.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Poverty

Poverty

Poverty

Households Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Poverty

Households Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Households Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

Current Value:

Households Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

11.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (14.0%), Washoe has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (11.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.3%).
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.1%), Washoe has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Washoe has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Washoe

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Washoe

7,783
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Poverty

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Poverty

People Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

Current Value:

People Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

10.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 10.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (12.7%), Washoe has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Washoe has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

Poverty

Veterans Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Poverty

Veterans Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Veterans Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

Current Value:

Veterans Living Below Poverty Level County: Washoe

9.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 9.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 9.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (8.2%), Washoe has a value of 9.8% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Washoe has a value of 9.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.