Search for Indicators

Health & Wellness

Healthy communities create a healthy economy and self-reliant families. When we invest in preventative measures as a cost-effective way to improve health, everyone takes an active role managing their own health and people have their basic healthcare needs met, including access to a variety of healthcare facilities and services.

This Community Dashboard sponsored by:

 

Access to Care

When quality medical care is hard to find and needed coverage is still unaffordable, it impacts health outcomes and overall individual, family and community health and economics.


According to America's Health Rankings, Nevada continues to rank near last on per capita state dollars dedicated to public health and federal dollars directed to states per person by the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention and the Health Resources & Services Administration (2-year estimates).

 Vital Social & Behavioral Health
Understanding personal health risks and choices helps the community converge on education and prevention, reducing the high cost of care and treatment for everyone, and the cost to the community in terms of productive lives cut short.


 Vital Statistics & Health Outcomes
Health data reveals emerging trends and areas in need of new policies or new systems so citizens can live longer, healthier lives increasing productivity and economic prosperity.

TMT tracked the leading cause of death in the past, and although the measure may not be as important as some other heath metrics, the data do act as an early warning sign for certain diseases and associated behaviors.  Understanding the causes of death helps residents assess health risks and allows the community to target eduction and prevention resources. Cause of death shows why the community is losing people who still should have productive years ahead of them.


Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Cancer

Cancer

Cancer

Adults with Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Cancer

Adults with Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Cancer County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults with Cancer County: Washoe

7.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Washoe has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer County: Washoe

18.8
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 18.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,778 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (21.7), Washoe has a value of 18.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(21.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.3), Washoe has a value of 18.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (18.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.0).
Prior Value
(21.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

Cancer

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Cancer

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer County: Washoe

136.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 136.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 142.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 161.8.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 136.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,080 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (146.0), Washoe has a value of 136.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(146.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (146.0), Washoe has a value of 136.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(146.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (136.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (144.4).
Prior Value
(144.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer County: Washoe

10.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 10.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,180 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (13.7), Washoe has a value of 10.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(13.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9), Washoe has a value of 10.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (10.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.4).
Prior Value
(12.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

Cancer

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Cancer

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer County: Washoe

26.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 26.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 48.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,746 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (31.2), Washoe has a value of 26.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(31.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Washoe has a value of 26.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (26.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.6).
Prior Value
(29.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer County: Washoe

19.8
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 19.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,612 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (20.4), Washoe has a value of 19.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(20.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0), Washoe has a value of 19.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (19.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.3).
Prior Value
(20.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

Cancer

Breast Cancer Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Cancer

Breast Cancer Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Breast Cancer Mortality Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Breast Cancer Mortality Rate County: Washoe

20.9
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (26.2), Washoe has a value of 20.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(26.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.1), Washoe has a value of 20.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (20.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.4).
Prior Value
(21.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

Cancer

Cervical Cancer Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Cancer

Cervical Cancer Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Cervical Cancer Mortality Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Mortality Rate County: Washoe

9.0
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (8.8), Washoe has a value of 9.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(8.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0), Washoe has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (9.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.6).
Prior Value
(6.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Cancer

Colorectal Cancer Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Cancer

Colorectal Cancer Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Colorectal Cancer Mortality Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Mortality Rate County: Washoe

12.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.7), Washoe has a value of 12.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.3), Washoe has a value of 12.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (12.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.0).
Prior Value
(18.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

Cancer

Lung Cancer Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Cancer

Lung Cancer Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Lung Cancer Mortality Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Lung Cancer Mortality Rate County: Washoe

31.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (34.7), Washoe has a value of 31.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(34.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (39.6), Washoe has a value of 31.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(39.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (31.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.2).
Prior Value
(32.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

Cancer

Prostate Cancer Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Cancer

Prostate Cancer Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Prostate Cancer Mortality Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Prostate Cancer Mortality Rate County: Washoe

21.0
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (21.1), Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(21.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (20.2), Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (21.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.6).
Prior Value
(15.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

Cancer

Cancer: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Cancer

Cancer: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Cancer: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Cancer: Medicare Population County: Washoe

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.0%), Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (11.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Disabilities and Difficulties

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults 65+ with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults 65+ with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Washoe

31.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (34.0%), Washoe has a value of 31.5%.
NV Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Washoe has a value of 31.5%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Washoe

13.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.3%), Washoe has a value of 13.6%.
NV Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Washoe has a value of 13.6%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Washoe

6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.5%), Washoe has a value of 6.2%.
NV Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Washoe has a value of 6.2%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Washoe

5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.6%), Washoe has a value of 5.6%.
NV Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Washoe has a value of 5.6%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Washoe

12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.9%), Washoe has a value of 12.3%.
NV Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Washoe has a value of 12.3%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults with Disability Living in Poverty County: Washoe

20.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 20.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 20.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.2%), Washoe has a value of 20.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(22.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Washoe has a value of 20.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Children with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Children with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Children with a Disability County: Washoe

Current Value:

Children with a Disability County: Washoe

4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.4%), Washoe has a value of 4.5%.
NV Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Washoe has a value of 4.5%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Washoe

Current Value:

Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty County: Washoe

4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.9%), Washoe has a value of 4.5%.
NV Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Washoe has a value of 4.5%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Persons with a Disability County: Washoe

Current Value:

Persons with a Disability County: Washoe

12.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.9%), Washoe has a value of 12.0%.
NV Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Washoe has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Persons with a Hearing Difficulty County: Washoe

Current Value:

Persons with a Hearing Difficulty County: Washoe

3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.8%), Washoe has a value of 3.8%.
NV Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Washoe has a value of 3.8%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Washoe

Current Value:

Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Washoe

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Washoe has a value of 2.3%.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Washoe has a value of 2.3%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Persons with a Vision Difficulty County: Washoe

Current Value:

Persons with a Vision Difficulty County: Washoe

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.6%), Washoe has a value of 2.3%.
NV Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Washoe has a value of 2.3%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Washoe

Current Value:

Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty County: Washoe

6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.9%), Washoe has a value of 6.3%.
NV Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Washoe has a value of 6.3%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Disabilities and Difficulties

Veterans with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Disabilities and Difficulties

Veterans with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Veterans with a Disability County: Washoe

Current Value:

Veterans with a Disability County: Washoe

30.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (30.5%), Washoe has a value of 30.0%.
NV Value
(30.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (29.8%), Washoe has a value of 30.0%.
US Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Health Conditions

Health Conditions

Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 20+ with Diabetes County: Washoe

7.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (7.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.3%).
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Experienced a Stroke County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults who Experienced a Stroke County: Washoe

3.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Washoe has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health Conditions

Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease County: Washoe

6.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Washoe has a value of 6.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health Conditions

Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure County: Washoe

73.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 73.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 73.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Washoe has a value of 73.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health Conditions

Adults with Arthritis

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Adults with Arthritis

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Arthritis County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults with Arthritis County: Washoe

27.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (26.6%), Washoe has a value of 27.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health Conditions

Adults with COPD

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Adults with COPD

Value
Compared to:

Adults with COPD County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults with COPD County: Washoe

6.9%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Washoe has a value of 6.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health Conditions

Adults with Current Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Adults with Current Asthma

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Current Asthma County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults with Current Asthma County: Washoe

10.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 10.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.9%), Washoe has a value of 10.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health Conditions

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes County: Washoe

10.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (10.6%), Washoe has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (10.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Adults with Kidney Disease

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Adults with Kidney Disease

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Kidney Disease County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults with Kidney Disease County: Washoe

3.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 3.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 3.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Washoe has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Washoe

4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
(2021)
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.0%), Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Asthma: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Asthma: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Asthma: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Asthma: Medicare Population County: Washoe

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Washoe has a value of 7.0%.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Washoe has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (7.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Washoe

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (12.0%), Washoe has a value of 12.0%.
NV Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Washoe has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

COPD: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

COPD: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Washoe

9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (11.0%), Washoe has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Washoe has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Washoe

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (17.0%), Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Washoe

17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (23.0%), Washoe has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Washoe has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Washoe

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (9.0%), Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Value
Compared to:

High Blood Pressure Prevalence County: Washoe

Current Value:

High Blood Pressure Prevalence County: Washoe

31.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 31.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 31.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Washoe has a value of 31.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

Health Conditions

High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Value
Compared to:

High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years County: Washoe

Current Value:

High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years County: Washoe

34.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 34.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 34.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Washoe has a value of 34.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health Conditions

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Washoe

64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 64.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (63.0%), Washoe has a value of 64.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Washoe has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (64.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Hypertension: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Hypertension: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Washoe

55.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 55.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 57.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 59.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 55.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (60.0%), Washoe has a value of 55.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Washoe has a value of 55.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (55.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (55.0%).
Prior Value
(55.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Washoe

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.0%), Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Washoe has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Washoe

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.0%), Washoe has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Washoe has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (11.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Washoe

31.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 31.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 31.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (31.0%), Washoe has a value of 31.0%.
NV Value
(31.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Washoe has a value of 31.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (31.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.0%).
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health Conditions

Stroke: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health Conditions

Stroke: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Washoe

4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.0%), Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Washoe has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults 65+ without Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults 65+ without Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ without Health Insurance County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 65+ without Health Insurance County: Washoe

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 0.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 0.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (1.3%), Washoe has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.8%), Washoe has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor

Value
Compared to:

Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults Unable to Afford to See a Doctor County: Washoe

12.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.0%), Washoe has a value of 12.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (12.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Value
Compared to:

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup County: Washoe

70.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 70.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 70.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (76.1%), Washoe has a value of 70.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults who Visited a Dentist

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults who Visited a Dentist

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Visited a Dentist County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults who Visited a Dentist County: Washoe

61.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 61.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 61.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (63.9%), Washoe has a value of 61.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(63.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Health Insurance County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults with Health Insurance County: Washoe

88.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 88.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 834 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (85.4%), Washoe has a value of 88.6% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.0%), Washoe has a value of 88.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (88.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (85.3%).
Prior Value
(85.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults without Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Adults without Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Adults without Health Insurance County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults without Health Insurance County: Washoe

10.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 10.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Washoe has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Children with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Children with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Children with Health Insurance County: Washoe

Current Value:

Children with Health Insurance County: Washoe

92.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 92.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 834 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (92.1%), Washoe has a value of 92.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(92.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.6%), Washoe has a value of 92.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (92.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.1%).
Prior Value
(93.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Children without Health Insurance: Under 18

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Children without Health Insurance: Under 18

Value
Compared to:

Children without Health Insurance: Under 18 County: Washoe

Current Value:

Children without Health Insurance: Under 18 County: Washoe

13.0%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.7%), Washoe has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Washoe has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (13.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Children without Health Insurance: Under 19

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Children without Health Insurance: Under 19

Value
Compared to:

Children without Health Insurance: Under 19 County: Washoe

Current Value:

Children without Health Insurance: Under 19 County: Washoe

17.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.5%), Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Washoe has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.1%).
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Cholesterol Test History

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Cholesterol Test History

Value
Compared to:

Cholesterol Test History County: Washoe

Current Value:

Cholesterol Test History County: Washoe

82.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 82.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 82.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Washoe has a value of 82.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Dentist Rate

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Dentist Rate

Value
Compared to:

Dentist Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Dentist Rate County: Washoe

71
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 71 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 23.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 71 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (66), Washoe has a value of 71 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(66)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (71) is greater and better than the previously measured value (70).
Prior Value
(70)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Geriatric Focus Nurse Practitioners Per 1,000 Population Aged 65+

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Geriatric Focus Nurse Practitioners Per 1,000 Population Aged 65+

Value
Compared to:

Geriatric Focus Nurse Practitioners Per 1,000 Population Aged 65+ County: Washoe

Current Value:

Geriatric Focus Nurse Practitioners Per 1,000 Population Aged 65+ County: Washoe

1.056
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (0.809), Washoe has a value of 1.056 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(0.809)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (1.056) is greater and better than the previously measured value (0.830).
Prior Value
(0.830)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

High School Students Who Visited a Dentist: Past Year

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

High School Students Who Visited a Dentist: Past Year

Value
Compared to:

High School Students Who Visited a Dentist: Past Year County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students Who Visited a Dentist: Past Year County: Washoe

74.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (68.1%), Washoe has a value of 74.2% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(68.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (74.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.3%).
Prior Value
(75.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Medicaid Enrollment

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Medicaid Enrollment

Value
Compared to:

Medicaid Enrollment County: Washoe

Current Value:

Medicaid Enrollment County: Washoe

21.2%
Percent (%)
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (29.3%), Washoe has a value of 21.2%.
NV Value
(29.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.8%), Washoe has a value of 21.2%.
US Value
(17.8% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (21.2%) is greater  than the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Middle School Students Who Visited a Dentist: Past Year

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Middle School Students Who Visited a Dentist: Past Year

Value
Compared to:

Middle School Students Who Visited a Dentist: Past Year County: Washoe

Current Value:

Middle School Students Who Visited a Dentist: Past Year County: Washoe

68.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (65.2%), Washoe has a value of 68.4% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(65.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (68.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.0%).
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate County: Washoe

128
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 128 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 128 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (109), Washoe has a value of 128 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(109)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (128) is greater and better than the previously measured value (122).
Prior Value
(122)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Persons with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Persons with Health Insurance

Value
Compared to:

Persons with Health Insurance County: Washoe

Current Value:

Persons with Health Insurance County: Washoe

87.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 87.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 87.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (86.8%), Washoe has a value of 87.1% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (87.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.0%).
Prior Value
(88.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Washoe

Current Value:

Persons with Private Health Insurance Only County: Washoe

58.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (51.8%), Washoe has a value of 58.0%.
NV Value
(51.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.7%), Washoe has a value of 58.0%.
US Value
(54.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (58.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (57.5%).
Prior Value
(57.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Value
Compared to:

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Washoe

Current Value:

Persons with Public Health Insurance Only County: Washoe

21.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (25.1%), Washoe has a value of 21.9%.
NV Value
(25.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (25.1%), Washoe has a value of 21.9%.
US Value
(25.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (21.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (20.8%).
Prior Value
(20.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Primary Care Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Healthcare Access and Infrastructure

Primary Care Provider Rate

Value
Compared to:

Primary Care Provider Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Primary Care Provider Rate County: Washoe

79
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 79 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 26.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 79 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (57), Washoe has a value of 79 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(57)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (79) is less and worse than the previously measured value (81).
Prior Value
(81)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Incidence Rates

Incidence Rates

Incidence Rates

All Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Incidence Rates

All Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

All Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

All Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

425.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 425.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 374.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 438.6.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 425.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 459.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 492.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,931 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (388.3), Washoe has a value of 425.1 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(388.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (444.4), Washoe has a value of 425.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(444.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (425.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (429.8).
Prior Value
(429.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Incidence Rates

Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Incidence Rates

Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

7.8
Cases per 100,000 females
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 7.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 727 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (8.4), Washoe has a value of 7.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(8.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Washoe has a value of 7.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (7.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.1).
Prior Value
(9.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Incidence Rates

Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Incidence Rates

Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Breast Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Breast Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

127.1
Cases per 100,000 females
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 127.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 125.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 137.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,712 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (113.0), Washoe has a value of 127.1 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(113.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (129.8), Washoe has a value of 127.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(129.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (127.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (131.5).
Prior Value
(131.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Incidence Rates

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Incidence Rates

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

29.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 29.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,613 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (34.0), Washoe has a value of 29.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(34.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4), Washoe has a value of 29.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (29.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.5).
Prior Value
(32.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Incidence Rates

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Incidence Rates

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

41.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 41.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 62.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,711 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (44.7), Washoe has a value of 41.7 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(44.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (53.1), Washoe has a value of 41.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(53.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (41.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (50.3).
Prior Value
(50.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Incidence Rates

Melanoma Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Incidence Rates

Melanoma Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Melanoma Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Melanoma Incidence Rate County: Washoe

43.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 43.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,182 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.7), Washoe has a value of 43.5 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(22.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7), Washoe has a value of 43.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (43.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.2).
Prior Value
(31.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Incidence Rates

Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Incidence Rates

Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

12.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 12.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,869 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.4), Washoe has a value of 12.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Washoe has a value of 12.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (12.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.7).
Prior Value
(11.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Incidence Rates

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Incidence Rates

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate County: Washoe

107.4
Cases per 100,000 males
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 107.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 110.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 127.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,728 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (94.1), Washoe has a value of 107.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(94.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (113.2), Washoe has a value of 107.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(113.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (107.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (104.0).
Prior Value
(104.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Incidence Rates

Salmonellosis Rate Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Incidence Rates

Salmonellosis Rate Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Salmonellosis Rate Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Salmonellosis Rate Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

5.9
Rate per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (9.2), Washoe has a value of 5.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(9.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.3), Washoe has a value of 5.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.3 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.0).
Prior Value
(4.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Incidence Rates

Tuberculosis Rate Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Incidence Rates

Tuberculosis Rate Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Tuberculosis Rate Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Tuberculosis Rate Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

1.8
Rate per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.6), Washoe has a value of 1.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.9), Washoe has a value of 1.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (1.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.2).
Prior Value
(1.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Influenza & Immunization

Influenza & Immunization

Influenza & Immunization

Combined 7-Vaccine Series Coverage: Children 19-35 Months

Value
Compared to:

Influenza & Immunization

Combined 7-Vaccine Series Coverage: Children 19-35 Months

Value
Compared to:

Combined 7-Vaccine Series Coverage: Children 19-35 Months County: Washoe

Current Value:

Combined 7-Vaccine Series Coverage: Children 19-35 Months County: Washoe

77.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (70.4%), Washoe has a value of 77.9% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(70.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (72.2%), Washoe has a value of 77.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.2% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (77.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (75.9%).
Prior Value
(75.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Influenza & Immunization

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Influenza & Immunization

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Washoe

50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 29.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 18.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (41.0%), Washoe has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Washoe has a value of 50.0%.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (50.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48.0%).
Prior Value
(48.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Influenza & Immunization

Influenza Hospitalizations Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Influenza & Immunization

Influenza Hospitalizations Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Influenza Hospitalizations Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Influenza Hospitalizations Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

41.5
Rate per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (17.5), Washoe has a value of 41.5 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(17.5 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5), Washoe has a value of 41.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (41.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (90.7).
Prior Value
(90.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Influenza & Immunization

Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Trends

Value
Compared to:

Influenza & Immunization

Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Trends

Value
Compared to:

Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Trends County: Washoe

Current Value:

Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) Trends County: Washoe

2.1%
Weekly percentage average
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Influenza & Immunization

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Influenza & Immunization

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Washoe

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Washoe has a value of 8.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Washoe has a value of 8.0%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality Rate

Mortality Rate

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease County: Washoe

17.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Washoe has a value of 17.4 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Washoe has a value of 17.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.4).
Prior Value
(20.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke) County: Washoe

45.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 45.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (38.3), Washoe has a value of 45.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(38.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Washoe has a value of 45.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (45.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.0).
Prior Value
(39.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases County: Washoe

43.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 43.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 50.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (47.1), Washoe has a value of 43.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(47.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.1), Washoe has a value of 43.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (43.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.3).
Prior Value
(47.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease County: Washoe

116.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 116.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (104.9), Washoe has a value of 116.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(104.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Washoe has a value of 116.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (116.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (118.6).
Prior Value
(118.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes County: Washoe

21.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.2), Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(22.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), Washoe has a value of 21.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (21.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.6).
Prior Value
(20.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack County: Washoe

43.1
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 43.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 65.2.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 43.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 87.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,101 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (30.6), Washoe has a value of 43.1 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(30.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (43.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (40.6).
Prior Value
(40.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia County: Washoe

13.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 13.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.3), Washoe has a value of 13.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Washoe has a value of 13.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (13.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6).
Prior Value
(15.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease County: Washoe

9.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 9.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,416 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (8.8), Washoe has a value of 9.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(8.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8), Washoe has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (9.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.1).
Prior Value
(8.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries County: Washoe

60.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 60.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 72.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (48.7), Washoe has a value of 60.5 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(48.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (51.6), Washoe has a value of 60.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (60.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.0).
Prior Value
(57.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

Mortality Rate

Age-adjusted Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Age-adjusted Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Age-adjusted Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Age-adjusted Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate County: Washoe

68.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (53.5), Washoe has a value of 68.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(53.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Washoe has a value of 68.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(57.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (68.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (59.2).
Prior Value
(59.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

Mortality Rate

Death Rate due to Injuries

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Death Rate due to Injuries

Value
Compared to:

Death Rate due to Injuries County: Washoe

Current Value:

Death Rate due to Injuries County: Washoe

96.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 96.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 93.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 111.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,037 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (83.7), Washoe has a value of 96.5 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(83.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (80.0), Washoe has a value of 96.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(80.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Mortality Rate

Life Expectancy

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Life Expectancy

Value
Compared to:

Life Expectancy County: Washoe

Current Value:

Life Expectancy County: Washoe

77.3
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 77.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 77.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (77.0), Washoe has a value of 77.3 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(77.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Washoe has a value of 77.3 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Mortality Rate

Mortality Rate Among Infants: Under 1 Year

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Mortality Rate Among Infants: Under 1 Year

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate Among Infants: Under 1 Year County: Washoe

Current Value:

Mortality Rate Among Infants: Under 1 Year County: Washoe

3.9
Rate per 1,000 live births
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.5), Washoe has a value of 3.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(4.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6), Washoe has a value of 3.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.1).
Prior Value
(6.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)

Mortality Rate

Mortality Rate Among Children: 0-19 Years

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Mortality Rate Among Children: 0-19 Years

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate Among Children: 0-19 Years County: Washoe

Current Value:

Mortality Rate Among Children: 0-19 Years County: Washoe

47.4
Rate per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (49.2), Washoe has a value of 47.4 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(49.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (53.9), Washoe has a value of 47.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(53.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (47.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (54.5).
Prior Value
(54.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality Rate

Mortality Rate for Leading Causes

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Mortality Rate for Leading Causes

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate for Leading Causes County: Washoe

Current Value:

Mortality Rate for Leading Causes County: Washoe

993.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (974.3), Washoe has a value of 993.7 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(974.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (984.1), Washoe has a value of 993.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(984.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (993.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (987.0).
Prior Value
(987.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortality Rate

Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Mortality Rate

Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate

Value
Compared to:

Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Unintentional Injury Mortality Rate County: Washoe

82.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (66.4), Washoe has a value of 82.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(66.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (68.1), Washoe has a value of 82.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(68.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (82.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (73.0).
Prior Value
(73.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Nutrition & Weight

Nutrition & Weight

Nutrition & Weight

Adult Fruit Consumption

Value
Compared to:

Nutrition & Weight

Adult Fruit Consumption

Value
Compared to:

Adult Fruit Consumption County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adult Fruit Consumption County: Washoe

57.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (58.1%), Washoe has a value of 57.5% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(58.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (57.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (61.4%).
Prior Value
(61.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Nutrition & Weight

Adult Vegetable Consumption

Value
Compared to:

Nutrition & Weight

Adult Vegetable Consumption

Value
Compared to:

Adult Vegetable Consumption County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adult Vegetable Consumption County: Washoe

77.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (76.0%), Washoe has a value of 77.6% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(76.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (77.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (78.9%).
Prior Value
(78.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Nutrition & Weight

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Nutrition & Weight

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 20+ Who Are Obese County: Washoe

25.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 25.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (25.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.5%).
Prior Value
(25.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)

Nutrition & Weight

Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Value
Compared to:

Nutrition & Weight

Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Value
Compared to:

Adults who are Overweight or Obese County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults who are Overweight or Obese County: Washoe

66.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (67.3%), Washoe has a value of 66.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(67.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (66.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (64.3%).
Prior Value
(64.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Are Obese

Value
Compared to:

High School Students Who Are Obese County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students Who Are Obese County: Washoe

11.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.0%), Washoe has a value of 11.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (11.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.7%).
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Are Overweight

Value
Compared to:

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Are Overweight

Value
Compared to:

High School Students Who Are Overweight County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students Who Are Overweight County: Washoe

13.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.5%), Washoe has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (13.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.1%).
Prior Value
(18.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Did Not Eat Breakfast: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Did Not Eat Breakfast: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

High School Students Who Did Not Eat Breakfast: Past 7 Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students Who Did Not Eat Breakfast: Past 7 Days County: Washoe

21.6
High school students
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (23.8), Washoe has a value of 21.6 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(23.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (21.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (76.2).
Prior Value
(76.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Drink Soda or Pop: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Drink Soda or Pop: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

High School Students Who Drink Soda or Pop: Past 7 Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students Who Drink Soda or Pop: Past 7 Days County: Washoe

9.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (13.1%), Washoe has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (9.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Eat Fruit: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Eat Fruit: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

High School Students Who Eat Fruit: Past 7 Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students Who Eat Fruit: Past 7 Days County: Washoe

33.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (27.4%), Washoe has a value of 33.4% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(27.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (33.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.9%).
Prior Value
(32.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Eat Vegetables: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

Nutrition & Weight

High School Students Who Eat Vegetables: Past 7 Days

Value
Compared to:

High School Students Who Eat Vegetables: Past 7 Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students Who Eat Vegetables: Past 7 Days County: Washoe

32.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (26.4%), Washoe has a value of 32.4% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (32.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.7%).
Prior Value
(31.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Physical Activity

Physical Activity

Physical Activity

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Physical Activity

Access to Exercise Opportunities

Value
Compared to:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Washoe

Current Value:

Access to Exercise Opportunities County: Washoe

88.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 88.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 28.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 88.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (90.6%), Washoe has a value of 88.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Washoe has a value of 88.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (88.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (88.3%).
Prior Value
(88.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Physical Activity

Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Value
Compared to:

Physical Activity

Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Value
Compared to:

Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 20+ who are Sedentary County: Washoe

17.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 17.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.6%).
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Physical Activity

Adults who meet U.S. Aerobic and Strength Guidelines

Value
Compared to:

Physical Activity

Adults who meet U.S. Aerobic and Strength Guidelines

Value
Compared to:

Adults who meet U.S. Aerobic and Strength Guidelines County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults who meet U.S. Aerobic and Strength Guidelines County: Washoe

26.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (20.0%), Washoe has a value of 26.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (26.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (27.3%).
Prior Value
(27.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

High School Students Who Were Not Physically Active: Past 7 Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students Who Were Not Physically Active: Past 7 Days County: Washoe

15.0
High school students
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.8), Washoe has a value of 15.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (15.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (52.4).
Prior Value
(52.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Physical Activity

Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Value
Compared to:

Physical Activity

Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Value
Compared to:

Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days County: Washoe

13.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.7%), Washoe has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Pregnancy and Birth

Pregnancy and Birth

High School Students who Did Not Use Any Method to Prevent Pregnancy County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students who Did Not Use Any Method to Prevent Pregnancy County: Washoe

7.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (18.3%), Washoe has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (7.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pregnancy and Birth

Low Birth Weight Babies

Value
Compared to:

Pregnancy and Birth

Low Birth Weight Babies

Value
Compared to:

Low Birth Weight Babies County: Washoe

Current Value:

Low Birth Weight Babies County: Washoe

8.9%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (9.2%), Washoe has a value of 8.9% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6%), Washoe has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Percent Born Preterm (less than 37 completed weeks of gestation) County: Washoe

Current Value:

Percent Born Preterm (less than 37 completed weeks of gestation) County: Washoe

10.2%
Percent of live births
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (10.8%), Washoe has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Washoe has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (10.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Percent of Women Receiving Prenatal Care in the First Trimester County: Washoe

Current Value:

Percent of Women Receiving Prenatal Care in the First Trimester County: Washoe

59.8%
Percentage of women
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (73.9%), Washoe has a value of 59.8% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(73.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.0%), Washoe has a value of 59.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (59.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (64.2%).
Prior Value
(64.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pregnancy and Birth

Premature Death

Value
Compared to:

Pregnancy and Birth

Premature Death

Value
Compared to:

Premature Death County: Washoe

Current Value:

Premature Death County: Washoe

8,057.5
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 8,057.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9,469.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11,769.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (8,316.9), Washoe has a value of 8,057.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(8,316.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7,971.5), Washoe has a value of 8,057.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Rate of Live Births Among Women Aged 15-19 Years Per 1,000 Females Aged 15-19 Years Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Rate of Live Births Among Women Aged 15-19 Years Per 1,000 Females Aged 15-19 Years Population County: Washoe

11.0
Per 1,000 females ages 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (11.7), Washoe has a value of 11.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Washoe has a value of 11.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (11.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.7).
Prior Value
(11.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pregnancy and Birth

Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Value
Compared to:

Pregnancy and Birth

Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Value
Compared to:

Teen Birth Rate: 15-19 County: Washoe

Current Value:

Teen Birth Rate: 15-19 County: Washoe

11.3
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (11.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.2).
Prior Value
(22.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventive Services

Preventive Services

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females County: Washoe

31.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 31.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 31.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Washoe has a value of 31.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males County: Washoe

41.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 41.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 41.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Washoe has a value of 41.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Preventive Services

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Services

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Value
Compared to:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 County: Washoe

Current Value:

Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65 County: Washoe

80.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 80.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 80.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Washoe has a value of 80.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Preventive Services

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Services

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Value
Compared to:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation County: Washoe

Current Value:

Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation County: Washoe

63.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 63.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 63.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.3%), Washoe has a value of 63.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Preventive Services

Males 40+ Years Who Received a PSA Test Within Past 2 Years

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Services

Males 40+ Years Who Received a PSA Test Within Past 2 Years

Value
Compared to:

Males 40+ Years Who Received a PSA Test Within Past 2 Years County: Washoe

Current Value:

Males 40+ Years Who Received a PSA Test Within Past 2 Years County: Washoe

31.7%
Percent (%) of males
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (29.5%), Washoe has a value of 31.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(29.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.8%), Washoe has a value of 31.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (31.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (29.8%).
Prior Value
(29.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventive Services

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Services

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Value
Compared to:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Washoe

Current Value:

Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74 County: Washoe

68.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 68.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 68.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (76.5%), Washoe has a value of 68.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Preventive Services

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Services

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Washoe

48.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 48.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 32.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 48.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (38.0%), Washoe has a value of 48.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Washoe has a value of 48.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (48.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (47.0%).
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventive Services

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Services

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Washoe

2,209
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 2,209 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,209 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,703.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 2,209 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,375.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2,788), Washoe has a value of 2,209 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2,788)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677), Washoe has a value of 2,209 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2,209) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1,912).
Prior Value
(1,912)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventive Services

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Value
Compared to:

Preventive Services

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Value
Compared to:

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair County: Washoe

Current Value:

Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair County: Washoe

18.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 18.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 18.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (17.9%), Washoe has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Chlamydia Incidence Rate County: Washoe

492.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 492.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 261.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 350.8.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 492.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 294.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 467.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (509.4), Washoe has a value of 492.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(509.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (495.0), Washoe has a value of 492.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (492.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (497.0).
Prior Value
(497.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Gonorrhea Incidence Rate County: Washoe

165.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 165.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 81.0.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 165.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 169.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (232.6), Washoe has a value of 165.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(232.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (194.4), Washoe has a value of 165.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (165.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (213.6).
Prior Value
(213.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Syphilis Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Syphilis Incidence Rate

Value
Compared to:

Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Syphilis Incidence Rate County: Washoe

30.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (28.4), Washoe has a value of 30.8 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(28.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7), Washoe has a value of 30.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (30.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.2).
Prior Value
(32.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

HIV Rate Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

HIV Rate Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

HIV Rate Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

HIV Rate Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

7.5
Rate per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (17.1), Washoe has a value of 7.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(17.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.3), Washoe has a value of 7.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (7.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.4).
Prior Value
(5.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Stage 3 HIV (Formerly Known as AIDS) Rate Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Stage 3 HIV (Formerly Known as AIDS) Rate Per 100,000 Population

Value
Compared to:

Stage 3 HIV (Formerly Known as AIDS) Rate Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

Current Value:

Stage 3 HIV (Formerly Known as AIDS) Rate Per 100,000 Population County: Washoe

2.8
Rate per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (5.8), Washoe has a value of 2.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(5.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.0), Washoe has a value of 2.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.0 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.2).
Prior Value
(3.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Sleep

Sleep

High School Students Who Got Eight or More Hours of Sleep on an Average School Night County: Washoe

Current Value:

High School Students Who Got Eight or More Hours of Sleep on an Average School Night County: Washoe

23.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (18.0%), Washoe has a value of 23.2% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (23.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.3%).
Prior Value
(24.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)

Middle School Students Who Get Nine or More Hours of Sleep on a Average School Night County: Washoe

Current Value:

Middle School Students Who Get Nine or More Hours of Sleep on a Average School Night County: Washoe

17.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (17.9%), Washoe has a value of 17.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(17.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.6%).
Prior Value
(19.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Sleep

Insufficient Sleep

Value
Compared to:

Sleep

Insufficient Sleep

Value
Compared to:

Insufficient Sleep County: Washoe

Current Value:

Insufficient Sleep County: Washoe

37.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 37.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 37.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.0%), Washoe has a value of 37.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

Other

Other

Other

Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Value
Compared to:

Other

Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss County: Washoe

11.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.2%), Washoe has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Other

Linguistic Isolation

Value
Compared to:

Other

Linguistic Isolation

Value
Compared to:

Linguistic Isolation County: Washoe

Current Value:

Linguistic Isolation County: Washoe

2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 2.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
NV Counties
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 2.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.3%), Washoe has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Washoe has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Other

People 65+ Living Alone

Value
Compared to:

Other

People 65+ Living Alone

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Alone County: Washoe

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone County: Washoe

26.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 26.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.6%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 26.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (24.3%), Washoe has a value of 26.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(24.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Washoe has a value of 26.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Other

People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Other

People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Washoe

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Washoe

21,476
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.