Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More

Adults who Drink Excessively

County: Washoe
Measurement Period: 2021
Filter: none (all Counties)
This indicator shows the percentage of adults who reported heavy drinking in the 30 days prior to the survey or binge drinking on at least one occasion during that period.

Why is this important?

Drinking alcohol has immediate physiological effects on all tissues of the body, including those in the brain. Alcohol is a depressant that impairs vision, coordination, reaction time, judgment, and decision-making, which may in turn lead to harmful behaviors. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, excessive alcohol use, either in the form of heavy drinking (drinking more than 15 drinks per week on average for men or more than eight drinks per week on average for women), or binge drinking (drinking more than five drinks during a single occasion for men or more than four drinks during a single occasion for women), can lead to increased risk of health problems, such as liver disease and unintentional injuries. Alcohol abuse is also associated with a variety of other negative outcomes, including employment problems, legal difficulties, financial loss, family disputes, and other interpersonal issues.
More...

County: Washoe

19.4%
Source: County Health Rankings
Measurement period: 2021
Maintained by: Conduent Healthy Communities Institute
Last update: April 2024
Filter(s) for this location: State: Nevada
Compared to See the Legend
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 19.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
NV Counties
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 19.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
Compared to the NV Value (14.9%), Washoe has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(14.9%)
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Washoe has a value of 19.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1%)
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (19.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.6%).
Prior Value
(22.6%)
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
Technical note: These estimates are produced from survey data and created using a complex statistical model. It is not appropriate to use this data for tracking/evaluation purposes, as the data are collected using sophisticated sampling techniques that can make them difficult to use for small geographic areas and population subgroups without carefully applying the correct statistical techniques. Modeled estimates are also not particularly good at incorporating the effects of local conditions, such as health promotion policies.
More details:
Original Source: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Graph Selections

Indicator Values
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Chart options:
  • Show Confidence Intervals
  • Enable zero-based y-axis
Change in methodology for 2014:
A new modeling technique was used to produce estimates for 2014 data. Therefore, 2014 data is not directly comparable to previous years of data.
Change in methodology for 2018:
Beginning with 2018, the CDC's BRFSS has updated their modeling procedure for producing small-area estimates.
CountyState
Select a comparison

Data Source

Filed under: Health / Alcohol & Drug Use, Health Behaviors, Adults

Related Content for: Adults who Drink Excessively