Search for Indicators

Land Use, Housing & Infrastructure

Housing and mobility options enable families to be more self-sufficient and businesses to be more profitable, while creative development allows for new ways to address community issues. The region has a view to improve with appropriate, affordable housing for all residents, as well as varied land uses to support diverse business development, economic growth and different types of active outdoor lifestyles.

This Community Dashboard sponsored by:

    

 


Affordable Housing
 Whether a typical family earning median wages can qualify for a mortgage loan, is especially important because housing is usually a family's largest expense, and transportation costs rise dramatically when families live farther away from the area they work and shop.
The Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) is defined as the share of homes that would have been affordable to a family earning the local median income based on standard mortgage underwriting criteria. National Association of Home Builders assumes that a family can afford to spend 28% of its gross income on housing. In addition to principal and interest; cost then also includes estimated property taxes and property insurance for the home. Mortgage insurance is not currently a component of the HOI.


The percentage of homes considered affordable for families making the median income began to decrease due to the rise in the median sales price since 2011, while family median income has remained almost the same for a decade, until just recently. The 2016 median sales price was as high as pre-recession prices, and continues to rise to new highs annually.


The County Health Rankings measure severe housing problems as the percentage of households with at least 1 of 4 housing problems: overcrowding (>1.5 persons/room), high housing costs (monthly >50% of income, excluding utilities), or lack of kitchen or plumbing facilities. Inadequate or poor quality housing contributes to health problems such as infectious and chronic diseases, injuries and child development issues.  Adequate housing should provide a sense of privacy, security, stability and control. The top US performers have 9% severe housing problems, substantially below Washoe County.


Mobility & Transport

Access to affordable and reliable modes of transportation, plus alternative and active transit options indicate an effective transportation system with a diversity of choices critical to our economy, traffic congestion, and the environment.


The 2040 Regional Transportation Plan set a 15% performance target for alternative mode share use by 2040 in the transit service area. The previous 2035 target of 10% was actually exceeded in the 2015 reporting year. In the future, it would be interesting to identify the percentage of workers over 16 years of age living  within 1/4 mile of an RTC bus stop and riding the bus to work, since the vast majority continue to drive to work alone. 


Infrastructure to move goods and passengers plays as important a role as regional roads and rail transport.  Passenger numbers and cargo poundage continue to increase overtime.


Development for Healthy Neighborhoods

Planning and community development across sectors including active lifestyles, diverse types of recreation and neighborhood livability, proactively promote healthy communities while providing the natural benefits of flood control, purifying air and water, and cooling the regions.


Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Housing

Housing

Housing

Cost of Housing Index (CHI)

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Cost of Housing Index (CHI)

Value
Compared to:

Cost of Housing Index (CHI) Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

Current Value:
52%
% of pre-tax income needed to make a mortgage payment on a median-priced home
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (39%), Reno-Sparks has a value of 52% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(39%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reno-Sparks (52%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (47%).
Prior Value
(47%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Cost of Housing Index (CHI): Low-income Families Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

Current Value:

Cost of Housing Index (CHI): Low-income Families Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

105%
% of pre-tax, low-income earnings needed to make a mortgage payment on a median-priced home
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (79%), Reno-Sparks has a value of 105% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(79%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reno-Sparks (105%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (95%).
Prior Value
(95%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Housing

Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Value
Compared to:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate County: Washoe

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (1.2%), Washoe has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Washoe has a value of 1.1%.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place: Reno

1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 1.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (1.1%), Reno has a value of 1.4% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (1.2%), Reno has a value of 1.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Reno has a value of 1.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Homeowner Vacancy Rate Census Place: Sparks

0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 0.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (1.1%), Sparks has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (1.2%), Sparks has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Sparks has a value of 0.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing

Home Heating Fuel Type: Utility Gas

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Home Heating Fuel Type: Utility Gas

Value
Compared to:

Home Heating Fuel Type: Utility Gas County: Washoe

Current Value:

Home Heating Fuel Type: Utility Gas County: Washoe

61.9%
Percent of households
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (59.3%), Washoe has a value of 61.9%.
NV Value
(59.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (46.5%), Washoe has a value of 61.9%.
US Value
(46.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (61.9%) is less  than the previously measured value (62.2%).
Prior Value
(62.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing

Homeownership

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Homeownership

Value
Compared to:

Homeownership County: Washoe

Current Value:

Homeownership County: Washoe

54.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Washoe has a value of 54.0%.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Washoe has a value of 54.0%.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeownership Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Homeownership Census Place: Reno

45.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (54.0%), Reno has a value of 45.4%.
Washoe, NV County Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Reno has a value of 45.4%.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Reno has a value of 45.4%.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeownership Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Homeownership Census Place: Sparks

55.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (54.0%), Sparks has a value of 55.2%.
Washoe, NV County Value
(54.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Sparks has a value of 55.2%.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Sparks has a value of 55.2%.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing

Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) Ranking

Value
Compared to:

Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) Ranking Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

Current Value:

Housing Opportunity Index (HOI) Ranking Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

20.1
Share of homes affordable for median income
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno-Sparks (20.1) is less and worse than the previously measured value (23.3).
Prior Value
(23.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno-Sparks value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing

Houses Built Prior to 1950

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Houses Built Prior to 1950

Value
Compared to:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 County: Washoe

Current Value:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 County: Washoe

4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.2%), Washoe has a value of 4.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washoe has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Houses Built Prior to 1950 Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 Census Place: Reno

6.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 6.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 128 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 6.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,990 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (4.5%), Reno has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (2.2%), Reno has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Reno has a value of 6.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Houses Built Prior to 1950 Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Houses Built Prior to 1950 Census Place: Sparks

3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 3.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.9% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 128 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,990 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (4.5%), Sparks has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (2.2%), Sparks has a value of 3.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Sparks has a value of 3.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing

Median Household Gross Rent

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Median Household Gross Rent

Value
Compared to:

Median Household Gross Rent County: Washoe

Current Value:

Median Household Gross Rent County: Washoe

$1,401
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of $1,401 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,004 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,254.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,382), Washoe has a value of $1,401 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($1,382)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Washoe has a value of $1,401 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Household Gross Rent Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Median Household Gross Rent Census Place: Reno

$1,360
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of $1,360 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,170 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,463.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 75 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($1,401), Reno has a value of $1,360 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($1,401)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,382), Reno has a value of $1,360 which is lower and better.
NV Value
($1,382)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Reno has a value of $1,360 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Household Gross Rent Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Median Household Gross Rent Census Place: Sparks

$1,526
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of $1,526 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,170 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,463.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 75 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($1,401), Sparks has a value of $1,526 which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
($1,401)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,382), Sparks has a value of $1,526 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($1,382)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Sparks has a value of $1,526 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing

Median Housing Unit Value

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Median Housing Unit Value

Value
Compared to:

Median Housing Unit Value County: Washoe

Current Value:

Median Housing Unit Value County: Washoe

$460,000
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of $460,000 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $242,200 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $174,600.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value ($373,800), Washoe has a value of $460,000 which is higher and better.
NV Value
($373,800)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Washoe has a value of $460,000 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Housing Unit Value Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Median Housing Unit Value Census Place: Reno

$462,100
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of $462,100 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $299,500 while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $169,700.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 99 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($460,000), Reno has a value of $462,100 which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($460,000)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($373,800), Reno has a value of $462,100 which is higher and better.
NV Value
($373,800)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Reno has a value of $462,100 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Housing Unit Value Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Median Housing Unit Value Census Place: Sparks

$423,500
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of $423,500 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50%  have a value higher than $299,500 while census places in the worst 25% have a value lower than $169,700.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 99 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($460,000), Sparks has a value of $423,500 which is lower and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
($460,000)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($373,800), Sparks has a value of $423,500 which is higher and better.
NV Value
($373,800)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Sparks has a value of $423,500 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage County: Washoe

Current Value:

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage County: Washoe

$543
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of $543 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $421 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $479.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value ($491), Washoe has a value of $543 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($491)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Washoe has a value of $543 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage Census Place: Reno

$540
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of $540 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $453 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $540.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 92 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($543), Reno has a value of $540 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($543)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($491), Reno has a value of $540 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($491)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Reno has a value of $540 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage Census Place: Sparks

$502
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of $502 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $453 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $540.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 92 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($543), Sparks has a value of $502 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($543)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($491), Sparks has a value of $502 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($491)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Sparks has a value of $502 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing

Median Sales Price of Existing Homes

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Median Sales Price of Existing Homes

Value
Compared to:

Median Sales Price of Existing Homes Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

Current Value:

Median Sales Price of Existing Homes Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA): Reno-Sparks

$635,300
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value ($418,700), Reno-Sparks has a value of $635,300 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($418,700)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Reno-Sparks ($635,300) is greater and worse than the previously measured value ($585,800).
Prior Value
($585,800)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno-Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs County: Washoe

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs County: Washoe

$1,965
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of $1,965 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,552 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,766.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,791), Washoe has a value of $1,965 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($1,791)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Washoe has a value of $1,965 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Place: Reno

$1,956
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of $1,956 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,694 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,956.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 88 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($1,965), Reno has a value of $1,956 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($1,965)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,791), Reno has a value of $1,956 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($1,791)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Reno has a value of $1,956 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs Census Place: Sparks

$1,887
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of $1,887 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,694 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,956.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 88 locales.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value ($1,965), Sparks has a value of $1,887 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
($1,965)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value ($1,791), Sparks has a value of $1,887 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
($1,791)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Sparks has a value of $1,887 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Washoe

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Washoe

49.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 49.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 49.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Washoe has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Washoe has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Reno

50.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 50.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 104 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 50.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (49.7%), Reno has a value of 50.2% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Reno has a value of 50.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Reno has a value of 50.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Census Place: Sparks

49.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 49.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.2%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 104 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 49.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (49.7%), Sparks has a value of 49.7%.
Washoe, NV County Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (52.8%), Sparks has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(52.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Sparks has a value of 49.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Housing

Subsidized Affordable Housing Inventory

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Subsidized Affordable Housing Inventory

Value
Compared to:

Subsidized Affordable Housing Inventory County: Washoe

Current Value:

Subsidized Affordable Housing Inventory County: Washoe

17.6
Rate of subsidized affordable housing units per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (17.6) is less and worse than the previously measured value (17.8).
Prior Value
(17.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing

Total Built Acres

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Total Built Acres

Value
Compared to:

Total Built Acres County: Washoe

Current Value:

Total Built Acres County: Washoe

193,180
Acres of land use
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (193,180) is less  than the previously measured value (201,975).
Prior Value
(201,975)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Built Acres Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Total Built Acres Census Place: Reno

36,841
Acres of land use
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno (36,841) is less  than the previously measured value (40,358).
Prior Value
(40,358)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Built Acres Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Total Built Acres Census Place: Sparks

12,103
Acres of land use
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sparks (12,103) is less  than the previously measured value (14,056).
Prior Value
(14,056)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Housing

Total Built Dwelling Units

Value
Compared to:

Housing

Total Built Dwelling Units

Value
Compared to:

Total Built Dwelling Units County: Washoe

Current Value:

Total Built Dwelling Units County: Washoe

4,529
Total dwelling units built
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4,529) is greater and better than the previously measured value (4,450).
Prior Value
(4,450)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Built Dwelling Units Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Total Built Dwelling Units Census Place: Reno

2,089
Total dwelling units built
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno (2,089) is less and worse than the previously measured value (2,919).
Prior Value
(2,919)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Built Dwelling Units Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Total Built Dwelling Units Census Place: Sparks

1,180
Total dwelling units built
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sparks (1,180) is greater and better than the previously measured value (1,077).
Prior Value
(1,077)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Construction & Environment

Construction & Environment

Construction & Environment

Building Permits Issued

Value
Compared to:

Construction & Environment

Building Permits Issued

Value
Compared to:

Building Permits Issued County: Washoe

Current Value:

Building Permits Issued County: Washoe

4,721
Number of building permits issued
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4,721) is less and worse than the previously measured value (4,841).
Prior Value
(4,841)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Building Permits Issued Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Building Permits Issued Census Place: Reno

9,813
Number of building permits issued
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno (9,813) is less and worse than the previously measured value (10,888).
Prior Value
(10,888)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Building Permits Issued Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Building Permits Issued Census Place: Sparks

4,890
Number of building permits issued
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sparks (4,890) is greater and better than the previously measured value (4,789).
Prior Value
(4,789)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Construction & Environment

Building Permits Valuation

Value
Compared to:

Construction & Environment

Building Permits Valuation

Value
Compared to:

Building Permits Valuation County: Washoe

Current Value:

Building Permits Valuation County: Washoe

$466,714,724
Dollar value of building permits issued
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe ($466,714,724) is less and worse than the previously measured value ($678,435,000).
Prior Value
($678,435,000)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Building Permits Valuation Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Building Permits Valuation Census Place: Reno

$1,490,853,134
Dollar value of building permits issued
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Reno ($1,490,853,134) is less and worse than the previously measured value ($1,516,831,000).
Prior Value
($1,516,831,000)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Building Permits Valuation Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Building Permits Valuation Census Place: Sparks

$241,583,709
Dollar value of building permits issued
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sparks ($241,583,709) is less and worse than the previously measured value ($352,541,584).
Prior Value
($352,541,584)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Construction & Environment

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Construction & Environment

Food Environment Index

Value
Compared to:

Food Environment Index County: Washoe

Current Value:

Food Environment Index County: Washoe

8.1
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.6.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 8.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (6.8), Washoe has a value of 8.1 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(6.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Washoe has a value of 8.1 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (8.1) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.8).
Prior Value
(7.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Transportation

Transportation

Transportation

Mean Travel Time to Work

Value
Compared to:

Transportation

Mean Travel Time to Work

Value
Compared to:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Washoe

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Washoe

22.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 22.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.2.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 22.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Washoe has a value of 22.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Washoe has a value of 22.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Reno

20.5
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 20.5 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.8 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.9.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 89 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 20.5 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (22.3), Reno has a value of 20.5 which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Reno has a value of 20.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Reno has a value of 20.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Sparks

23.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 23.3 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.8 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.9.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 89 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 23.3 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (22.3), Sparks has a value of 23.3 which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Sparks has a value of 23.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Sparks has a value of 23.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Transportation

New Bike Lanes

Value
Compared to:

Transportation

New Bike Lanes

Value
Compared to:

New Bike Lanes County: Washoe

Current Value:

New Bike Lanes County: Washoe

4
Miles
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4) is less and worse than the previously measured value (6).
Prior Value
(6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Transportation

New Pedestrianways

Value
Compared to:

Transportation

New Pedestrianways

Value
Compared to:

New Pedestrianways County: Washoe

Current Value:

New Pedestrianways County: Washoe

4
Miles
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4).
Prior Value
(4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Transportation

Proximity to Highways

Value
Compared to:

Transportation

Proximity to Highways

Value
Compared to:

Proximity to Highways County: Washoe

Current Value:

Proximity to Highways County: Washoe

4.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 4.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (4.9%), Washoe has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Access Bus Passengers County: Washoe

Current Value:

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Access Bus Passengers County: Washoe

105,614
RTC Access ridership
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (105,614) is less and worse than the previously measured value (118,659).
Prior Value
(118,659)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Transit Bus Passengers County: Washoe

Current Value:

Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) Annual Transit Bus Passengers County: Washoe

4,865,750
RTC Transit ridership
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4,865,750) is greater and better than the previously measured value (3,597,006).
Prior Value
(3,597,006)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Transportation

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Value
Compared to:

Transportation

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Value
Compared to:

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute County: Washoe

Current Value:

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute County: Washoe

23.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (32.1%), Washoe has a value of 23.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Washoe has a value of 23.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (23.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.1%).
Prior Value
(24.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Transportation

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Transportation

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation County: Washoe

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation County: Washoe

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 1.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Washoe has a value of 1.9% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Washoe has a value of 1.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Census Place: Reno

2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (1.9%), Reno has a value of 2.6% which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Reno has a value of 2.6% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Reno has a value of 2.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Census Place: Sparks

1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (1.9%), Sparks has a value of 1.8% which is lower and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Sparks has a value of 1.8% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Sparks has a value of 1.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Transportation

Workers who Bike to Work

Value
Compared to:

Transportation

Workers who Bike to Work

Value
Compared to:

Workers who Bike to Work County: Washoe

Current Value:

Workers who Bike to Work County: Washoe

0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 0.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
NV Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (0.3%), Washoe has a value of 0.4% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Washoe has a value of 0.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Bike to Work Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Workers who Bike to Work Census Place: Reno

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (0.4%), Reno has a value of 0.7% which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(0.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (0.3%), Reno has a value of 0.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Reno has a value of 0.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Bike to Work Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Workers who Bike to Work Census Place: Sparks

0.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (0.4%), Sparks has a value of 0.2% which is lower and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(0.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (0.3%), Sparks has a value of 0.2% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.5%), Sparks has a value of 0.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Transportation

Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Value
Compared to:

Transportation

Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Value
Compared to:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work County: Washoe

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work County: Washoe

71.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 71.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 71.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (73.6%), Washoe has a value of 71.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Washoe has a value of 71.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Census Place: Reno

69.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Reno has a value of 69.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 75.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.5%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 119 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Reno has a value of 69.5% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 85.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,625 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (71.5%), Reno has a value of 69.5% which is lower and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(71.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (73.6%), Reno has a value of 69.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Reno has a value of 69.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Census Place: Sparks

74.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Census Places, Sparks has a value of 74.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 75.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.5%.
NV Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 119 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Sparks has a value of 74.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 85.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,625 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (71.5%), Sparks has a value of 74.9% which is higher and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(71.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (73.6%), Sparks has a value of 74.9% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Sparks has a value of 74.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Transportation

Workers who Walk to Work

Value
Compared to:

Transportation

Workers who Walk to Work

Value
Compared to:

Workers who Walk to Work County: Washoe

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work County: Washoe

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 2.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (1.5%), Washoe has a value of 2.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Washoe has a value of 2.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Walk to Work Census Place: Reno

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work Census Place: Reno

2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (2.0%), Reno has a value of 2.7% which is higher and better.
Washoe, NV County Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (1.5%), Reno has a value of 2.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Reno has a value of 2.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Walk to Work Census Place: Sparks

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work Census Place: Sparks

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Washoe, NV County Value (2.0%), Sparks has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
Washoe, NV County Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Washoe County value.
Compared to the NV Value (1.5%), Sparks has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Sparks has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sparks value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.