Search for Indicators

Natural Environment

 Clean air and water support healthy communities, recreational options and diverse wildlife, and investing in natural resources now benefits future generations.  As much as possible, we live in harmony with our environment to enjoy the diverse and beautiful lands, plants and animals that make the Truckee Meadows unique.
This Community Dashboard sponsored by:

Air Quality
The region’s air quality affects the health of our more vulnerable citizens and impacts an active outdoor lifestyle important for tourism, attracting young professionals to the region, and overall health.

The National Ambient Air Quality Standards (previously Pollution Standard Index) measure the region’s air quality affecting our health and outdoor lifestyle, important for tourism and attracting young professionals to the region.  Washoe County tracks and produces a 10-year trend report for pollutants.  Ozone, which especially affects people with asthma, is typically a summer phenomena from vehicle exhaust, heat, sunlight and wind-carried pollutants from other metropolitan areas.  Small particulate matter (PM) are particularly dangerous because they can enter the bloodstream by passing through the lungs.  Wildfires may not smell smokey, making small PM particularly dangerous.  Wildfires are generally linked to “red” air quality days, but this indicator is also influenced by the following: weather (e.g., high wind blown dust); vehicle miles traveled; congestion; public transportation; alternative transportation; smoke from wildfires, controlled burns or fireplaces; industries; and how often the roads are sanded.

Renewable energy sources directly impact our health, economy and environment, and provide natural resource stewardship for future generations.  

Clean & Available Water

A sustainable water supply is a vital component of quality of life in the Truckee Meadows. Meeting community demand requires a long-term outlook for not only water resource management but also initiatives to ensure the Truckee River watershed is healthy and thriving in perpetuity.


The region’s primary drinking water utility is Truckee Meadows Water Authority (TMWA), a community-based water utility formed through a joint-powers agreement between the City of Reno, City of Sparks and Washoe County. TMWA’s water supply portfolio is a mix of surface water and groundwater that serves over 440,000 residents. Groundwater provides approximately 15-20% of supply from regional aquifers. Surface water is conveyed by the Truckee River, which provides 80-85% of the water TMWA produces but amounts to approximately 3-9% of total river flow. Upstream drought reserves are held in six reservoirs and are held primarily for use during drought. Detailed storage information can be found on TMWA’s upstream reserves tracker.

 Water demand and conservation outcomes can best be understood by viewing production and consumption data in context of total population (see graphs below). One of the most impactful reductions in demand was due to the conversion from a flat rate to a metered rate billing system.  

Smaller residential lots and drought-friendly landscaping have also factored into the ability to serve more people with less water, as outdoor irrigation in the summer can increase residential consumption significantly. Of note, summertime conservation with Assigned Day Watering has been in effect since the mid-1980s. This program helps distribute demand across the system during the summer.

For more information about the quality of our region's drinking water, visit www.tmwa.com.

 


In community water utilities across the United States, raw water sources must be tested and processed to ensure water is safe to drink. The EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act sets these parameters and defines the term "contaminant" as being anything in the water other than water molecules.

All drinking water may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminant. The EPA sets legal threshold limits on more than 90 contaminants for drinking water systems to protect human health. Each year (by July 1), the EPA requires community water systems to release a Consumer Confidence Report to its customers, which is also known as an annual drinking water quality report.

The following subset of data focuses on drinking water quality and is sourced from Truckee Meadows Water Authority’s (TMWA) Annual Water Quality Reports. To view a full set of testing results, go to TMWA’s most current Water Quality ReportWater quality data is also available for specific neighborhoods. TMWA's Water Quality Department is available to get additional context to these findings at 775-834-8118.


Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Access to our Natural Environment

Access to our Natural Environment

Access to our Natural Environment

Access to Parks

Value
Compared to:

Access to our Natural Environment

Access to Parks

Value
Compared to:

Access to Parks County: Washoe

Current Value:

Access to Parks County: Washoe

94.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 94.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washoe has a value of 94.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 9.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (81.7%), Washoe has a value of 94.8% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(81.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (94.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (88.8%).
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Access to our Natural Environment

Parks and Playgrounds

Value
Compared to:

Access to our Natural Environment

Parks and Playgrounds

Value
Compared to:

Parks and Playgrounds County: Washoe

Current Value:

Parks and Playgrounds County: Washoe

94
Number of parks and playgrounds
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (94) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94).
Prior Value
(94)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Access to our Natural Environment

Park Acreage Rate

Value
Compared to:

Access to our Natural Environment

Park Acreage Rate

Value
Compared to:

Park Acreage Rate County: Washoe

Current Value:

Park Acreage Rate County: Washoe

3.79
Park acreage rate per 1,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3.79) is less and worse than the previously measured value (3.87).
Prior Value
(3.87)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Air Quality

Air Quality

Air Quality

Air Quality Index: Number of Good Days

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality

Air Quality Index: Number of Good Days

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality Index: Number of Good Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

Air Quality Index: Number of Good Days County: Washoe

229
Days
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (229) is greater and better than the previously measured value (198).
Prior Value
(198)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Air Quality

Air Quality Index: Number of Moderate Days

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality

Air Quality Index: Number of Moderate Days

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality Index: Number of Moderate Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

Air Quality Index: Number of Moderate Days County: Washoe

127
Days
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (127) is less and better than the previously measured value (132).
Prior Value
(132)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Air Quality Index: Number of Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

Air Quality Index: Number of Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups Days County: Washoe

1
Days
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (1) is less and better than the previously measured value (16).
Prior Value
(16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Air Quality

Air Quality Index: Number of Unhealthy Days

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality

Air Quality Index: Number of Unhealthy Days

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality Index: Number of Unhealthy Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

Air Quality Index: Number of Unhealthy Days County: Washoe

6
Days
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (6) is less and better than the previously measured value (16).
Prior Value
(16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Air Quality

Air Quality Index: Number of Very Unhealthy Days

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality

Air Quality Index: Number of Very Unhealthy Days

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality Index: Number of Very Unhealthy Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

Air Quality Index: Number of Very Unhealthy Days County: Washoe

2
Days
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2) is less and better than the previously measured value (3).
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Air Quality

Annual Ozone Air Quality

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality

Annual Ozone Air Quality

Value
Compared to:

Annual Ozone Air Quality County: Washoe

Current Value:

Annual Ozone Air Quality County: Washoe

5
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Washoe has a value of 5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Air Quality

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality

Annual Particle Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Annual Particle Pollution County: Washoe

Current Value:

Annual Particle Pollution County: Washoe

5
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Washoe has a value of 5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Air Quality

PBT Released

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality

PBT Released

Value
Compared to:

PBT Released County: Washoe

Current Value:

PBT Released County: Washoe

1,271
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (1,271) is less and better than the previously measured value (4,875).
Prior Value
(4,875)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Air Quality

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Value
Compared to:

Air Quality

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Value
Compared to:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air County: Washoe

Current Value:

Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air County: Washoe

3,232
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (3,232) is less and better than the previously measured value (6,607).
Prior Value
(6,607)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Extreme Weather

Extreme Weather

Extreme Weather

Number of Extreme Heat Days

Value
Compared to:

Extreme Weather

Number of Extreme Heat Days

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Heat Days County: Washoe

36
Days
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (36) is less and better than the previously measured value (47).
Prior Value
(47)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Extreme Weather

Number of Extreme Heat Events

Value
Compared to:

Extreme Weather

Number of Extreme Heat Events

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Washoe

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Heat Events County: Washoe

9
Events
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (9) is less and better than the previously measured value (35).
Prior Value
(35)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Extreme Weather

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Value
Compared to:

Extreme Weather

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Value
Compared to:

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Washoe

Current Value:

Number of Extreme Precipitation Days County: Washoe

6
Days
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (6) is less and better than the previously measured value (15).
Prior Value
(15)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Extreme Weather

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Value
Compared to:

Extreme Weather

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Value
Compared to:

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Washoe

Current Value:

Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse County: Washoe

47
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (47) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26).
Prior Value
(26)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Truckee River Education

Truckee River Education

Truckee River Education

Adults Participating in Truckee River Education Programs

Value
Compared to:

Truckee River Education

Adults Participating in Truckee River Education Programs

Value
Compared to:

Adults Participating in Truckee River Education Programs County: Washoe

Current Value:

Adults Participating in Truckee River Education Programs County: Washoe

2,641
Number of Adults
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (2,641) is greater and better than the previously measured value (1,152).
Prior Value
(1,152)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Truckee River Education

Importance of the Truckee River to People

Value
Compared to:

Truckee River Education

Importance of the Truckee River to People

Value
Compared to:

Importance of the Truckee River to People County: Washoe

Current Value:

Importance of the Truckee River to People County: Washoe

98.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (98.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (99.1%).
Prior Value
(99.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Truckee River Education

Knowing that the Truckee River Supplies 85% of Our Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Truckee River Education

Knowing that the Truckee River Supplies 85% of Our Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Knowing that the Truckee River Supplies 85% of Our Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Knowing that the Truckee River Supplies 85% of Our Drinking Water County: Washoe

79.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (79.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (86.9%).
Prior Value
(86.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Truckee River Education

Students Participating in Truckee River Education Programs

Value
Compared to:

Truckee River Education

Students Participating in Truckee River Education Programs

Value
Compared to:

Students Participating in Truckee River Education Programs County: Washoe

Current Value:

Students Participating in Truckee River Education Programs County: Washoe

10,935
Number of Students
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (10,935) is greater and better than the previously measured value (5,523).
Prior Value
(5,523)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Truckee River Education

Amenities Available Along the Truckee River

Value
Compared to:

Truckee River Education

Amenities Available Along the Truckee River

Value
Compared to:

Amenities Available Along the Truckee River County: Washoe

Current Value:

Amenities Available Along the Truckee River County: Washoe

185
Number of Amenities
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (185), the target has  been met.
Community Target
(185)

Truckee River Education

Knowing What Non-Point Source Pollution Is

Value
Compared to:

Truckee River Education

Knowing What Non-Point Source Pollution Is

Value
Compared to:

Knowing What Non-Point Source Pollution Is County: Washoe

Current Value:

Knowing What Non-Point Source Pollution Is County: Washoe

41.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (41.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (59.8%).
Prior Value
(59.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Truckee River Education

Resources to Manage the Truckee River Corridor

Value
Compared to:

Truckee River Education

Resources to Manage the Truckee River Corridor

Value
Compared to:

Resources to Manage the Truckee River Corridor County: Washoe

Current Value:

Resources to Manage the Truckee River Corridor County: Washoe

92.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (92.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (94.4%).
Prior Value
(94.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Water Quality & Usage

Water Quality & Usage

Water Quality & Usage

Water Consumption: Total Production

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Water Consumption: Total Production

Value
Compared to:

Water Consumption: Total Production County: Washoe

Current Value:

Water Consumption: Total Production County: Washoe

88,574
Acre feet
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (88,574) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (88,426).
Prior Value
(88,426)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Water Quality & Usage

Water Consumption: Total Retail Water Use (acre feet)

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Water Consumption: Total Retail Water Use (acre feet)

Value
Compared to:

Water Consumption: Total Retail Water Use (acre feet) County: Washoe

Current Value:

Water Consumption: Total Retail Water Use (acre feet) County: Washoe

88,574
Acre feet
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (88,574) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (88,426).
Prior Value
(88,426)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Water Quality & Usage

Water Consumption: Usage Per Person

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Water Consumption: Usage Per Person

Value
Compared to:

Water Consumption: Usage Per Person County: Washoe

Current Value:

Water Consumption: Usage Per Person County: Washoe

60,269
Gallons
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (60,269) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (56,787).
Prior Value
(56,787)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Water Quality & Usage

Antimony Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Antimony Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Antimony Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Antimony Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

1.6
Micrograms per liter (ug per L)
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA (6), the target has  been met.
Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
(6)

Water Quality & Usage

Arsenic Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Arsenic Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Arsenic Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Arsenic Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

6.5
Micrograms per liter (ug per L)
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA (10), the target has  been met.
Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
(10)

Water Quality & Usage

Chromium Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Chromium Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Chromium Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Chromium Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

7.1
Micrograms per liter (ug per L)
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA (100), the target has  been met.
Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
(100)

Water Quality & Usage

Copper Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Copper Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Copper Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Copper Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

0.134
Milligrams per liter (mg per L)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Action Level set by the EPA (1.3), the target has  been met.
Action Level set by the EPA
(1.3)

Water Quality & Usage

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Value
Compared to:

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Washoe

Current Value:

Daily Dose of UV Irradiance County: Washoe

4,374
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Washoe has a value of 4,374 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4,383 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4,524.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (4,419), Washoe has a value of 4,374 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(4,419)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (4,374) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3,803).
Prior Value
(3,803)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washoe value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Water Quality & Usage

Fluoride Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Fluoride Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Fluoride Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Fluoride Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

0.242
Milligrams per liter (mg per L)
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA (4), the target has  been met.
Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
(4)

Water Quality & Usage

Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

36
Micrograms per liter (ug per L)
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA (60), the target has  been met.
Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
(60)

Knowing Ways to Limit Non-Point Source Water Pollution to the Truckee River County: Washoe

Current Value:

Knowing Ways to Limit Non-Point Source Water Pollution to the Truckee River County: Washoe

66.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (66.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (72.2%).
Prior Value
(72.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Water Quality & Usage

Lead Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Lead Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Lead Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Lead Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

0.00
Micrograms per liter (ug per L)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Action Level set by the EPA (15), the target has  been met.
Action Level set by the EPA
(15)

Water Quality & Usage

Nitrate-as-Nitrogen Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Nitrate-as-Nitrogen Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Nitrate-as-Nitrogen Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Nitrate-as-Nitrogen Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

7.5
Milligrams per liter (mg per L)
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA (10), the target has  been met.
Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
(10)

Water Quality & Usage

Taking Steps to Prevent Non-Point Source Water Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Taking Steps to Prevent Non-Point Source Water Pollution

Value
Compared to:

Taking Steps to Prevent Non-Point Source Water Pollution County: Washoe

Current Value:

Taking Steps to Prevent Non-Point Source Water Pollution County: Washoe

88.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washoe (88.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (87.8%).
Prior Value
(87.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Water Quality & Usage

Tetrachloroethylene Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Tetrachloroethylene Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Tetrachloroethylene Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Tetrachloroethylene Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

1.5
Micrograms per liter (ug per L)
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA (5), the target has  been met.
Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
(5)

Water Quality & Usage

Trichloroethylene Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Trichloroethylene Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Trichloroethylene Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Trichloroethylene Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

2.4
Micrograms per liter (ug per L)
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA (5), the target has  been met.
Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
(5)

Water Quality & Usage

Trihalomethanes (TTHM)s Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Trihalomethanes (TTHM)s Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Trihalomethanes (TTHM)s Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Trihalomethanes (TTHM)s Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

42
Micrograms per liter (ug per L)
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA (80), the target has  been met.
Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
(80)

Water Quality & Usage

Uranium Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Water Quality & Usage

Uranium Contaminants in Drinking Water

Value
Compared to:

Uranium Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

Current Value:

Uranium Contaminants in Drinking Water County: Washoe

13.5
Micrograms per liter (ug per L)
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA (30), the target has  been met.
Maximum Contaminant Level set by EPA
(30)